What counts as racism?
A reference page for definitions, counterarguments, global examples, and the weak spots in “power + prejudice” claims.
Debate notes - evidence first
A home base for the topics I keep returning to: racism, Palestine, the Rohingya, the Uyghurs, occupation, rights, and the way people start bending words once the evidence gets uncomfortable. The aim is not noise. The aim is clarity.
A reference page for definitions, counterarguments, global examples, and the weak spots in “power + prejudice” claims.
A calmer argument: not every point is a chant, not every criticism is antisemitism, and not every civilian death can be brushed aside by saying “security.”
Statelessness written into law in 1982, a military campaign documented as it happened, and a case now sitting with the International Court of Justice.
Mass detention decided by algorithm, a UN finding of possible crimes against humanity, and a genocide claim that has to be stated precisely to survive.
Identity cards printed by colonial administrators, citizenship laws written in 1981, and the deadliest war since 1945 still treated as background noise.
Same language, same religion, same ancestry, same country — and a family registry that says which village your line came from. The case with no variable left to hide behind.
Five centuries of heritable slavery, a genocide unacknowledged until 1982, court-proven school segregation, and sterilisations that ran until 2012. White perpetrators, white victims.
Everyone involved is Muslim and African, and people are still sorted at checkpoints by a category the state built. The same militia, twice, twenty years apart, under two names.
A job, a university place and sometimes a passport depend on a document certifying which people you descend from. Legislated, operating today, and nobody involved is white.
The project is built around one rule: use the same definitions even when they become inconvenient. If a principle only works when it protects your side, it is not a principle. It is decoration.